According to everyone in the media there is quite a QB dilemma brewing in Philadelphia. to anyone with common sense who has ever followed the Eagles, they know better. Andy Reid is a terrible head coach. he makes awful clock management decsions, he has the most predictable play calling (run once every 6 series') and he has no zest, no pop, no bravado behind the podium. but if theres one thing Andy Reid is, its committed to his game plan and players.
But the media seems to love the idea of vick as qb and i truly believe they have NEVER fully grasped the idea of Kevin Kolb as the qb. why's this? there are a few reasons:
-- Mike Vick has been to an NFC championship game (in philly no less)
--Mike Vick has a few records, has had a few amazing big breaks, and is a big play QB
--Kevin Kolb went to a little school, had little exposure, and "rusted" on the bench
--Kevin Kolb just doesn't look like an elite passer/gun slinger
Does this make a quarterback dilemma? No, does this set up for the world saying "Hey Andy, your an idiot..."? probably. but this is NOT a convroversy until:
--Vick starts this weekend and blows up for 300 passing yards and 200 rushing yards (or as i call it, Denard Robinson statistics)
--Kolb comes back in time for the host of the McNabb led Redskins and stinks up the linc
THEN Andy Reid is set up with a QB dilemma. as long as Vick has been able to sit on the bench like steamin willie beamen, no one remembers JUST HOW electric he is. Kevin Kolb isn't going to just show up as 2010 Aaron Rodgers, but maybe 2008 Rodgers. rusty, not the best team/competitor, but flashes of brilliance and in 3 years at the helm, dynamic and all-pro. But can philly fans actually rest with the idea of rebuilding when a true competitor and leader festers on the bench making $5 dolars? no, will they, maybe. if everyone keeps saying there is a massive qb controversy, there WILL be a massive qb controversy. until then the true Philadelphia faithful might just be blinded by love enough to realize what a sinking ship they're on
but hey, thats just me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Saturday, August 28, 2010
The Harrisburg Stizzlers
For several years now i've participated in a fantasy football league with the guys in the family (and yes, that does include my sister Linda). To say i've competed in the league is to say that i was competitive... and i try to lie as little as possible on this blog so...
I had Tom Brady and Randy Moss the year the broke the single season records together, and that season i finished third. to date that is my best finish. I am usually pretty bad at drafting, drafting all heart no head and going for combo points and having multiple players from one team. Last year i went 1-16 so this year i needed a change. after talking to Stiz, we decided to combine our ownership, and i would take over his team (with my pitiful team disolving). thus the Harrisburg Stizzlers was born.
I feel confident that we'll be competetive, but i'll be honest, if my players all stay healthy i can make a run for this thing. So without further ado, Ladies and Gentleman, your 2010 HARRISBURG STIZZLERS!!
QB's
Peyton Manning, Phillip Rivers, Carson Palmer, Chad Henne. Its pretty sweet when the only question mark a position is your 4th string player.
RB's
Rasharrd Mendenhal, Ronnie Brown, Shonn Green, Steve Slaton, Reggie Bush.What i like about this list is by week 4 i'll know which backs to use against which match-ups and have plenty of options and in the meantime i have 4 starting running backs.
WR's
Desean Jackson, Santanna Moss, Wes Welker, Jacoby Jones, Dez Bryant. Clearly this is my weakest position by far. we have a large leage and i waited two rounds too long before getting a franchise WR. lets see if anyone truly steps up...
TE's
Jason Witten, Antonio Gates. Nasty
K - Nate Kaeding
DEF - Pittsburgh
DE
Dwight Freeney, Robert Mathis. You may think it irresponsible to have both indy DE's on your team... but they're both beasts and as long as i check the matchup i'll know who to start. and if one goes down with an injury i have a second option.
DT - Jay Ratliff. What can you say about a D-tackle. least glamorous position on D
LB's
Paul Pusluzny, Terrell Suggs, Demarcus Ware, James Harrison. This list of line backers makes me REALLY wish we had more than one damn staring LB
CB's - Charles Woodson. beautiful bastard
S
Darren Sharper, Troy Polamalu. Simply amazing
Like i said, if they stay healthy my players should be solid... we shall see. more to come as the season progresses.
I had Tom Brady and Randy Moss the year the broke the single season records together, and that season i finished third. to date that is my best finish. I am usually pretty bad at drafting, drafting all heart no head and going for combo points and having multiple players from one team. Last year i went 1-16 so this year i needed a change. after talking to Stiz, we decided to combine our ownership, and i would take over his team (with my pitiful team disolving). thus the Harrisburg Stizzlers was born.
I feel confident that we'll be competetive, but i'll be honest, if my players all stay healthy i can make a run for this thing. So without further ado, Ladies and Gentleman, your 2010 HARRISBURG STIZZLERS!!
QB's
Peyton Manning, Phillip Rivers, Carson Palmer, Chad Henne. Its pretty sweet when the only question mark a position is your 4th string player.
RB's
Rasharrd Mendenhal, Ronnie Brown, Shonn Green, Steve Slaton, Reggie Bush.What i like about this list is by week 4 i'll know which backs to use against which match-ups and have plenty of options and in the meantime i have 4 starting running backs.
WR's
Desean Jackson, Santanna Moss, Wes Welker, Jacoby Jones, Dez Bryant. Clearly this is my weakest position by far. we have a large leage and i waited two rounds too long before getting a franchise WR. lets see if anyone truly steps up...
TE's
Jason Witten, Antonio Gates. Nasty
K - Nate Kaeding
DEF - Pittsburgh
DE
Dwight Freeney, Robert Mathis. You may think it irresponsible to have both indy DE's on your team... but they're both beasts and as long as i check the matchup i'll know who to start. and if one goes down with an injury i have a second option.
DT - Jay Ratliff. What can you say about a D-tackle. least glamorous position on D
LB's
Paul Pusluzny, Terrell Suggs, Demarcus Ware, James Harrison. This list of line backers makes me REALLY wish we had more than one damn staring LB
CB's - Charles Woodson. beautiful bastard
S
Darren Sharper, Troy Polamalu. Simply amazing
Like i said, if they stay healthy my players should be solid... we shall see. more to come as the season progresses.
Sunday, August 22, 2010
If i were Reuben Amarro Jr....
Allow me to go over the last calender's year worth of phils moves.
1.) Trade for Cliff Lee. watch him tear up the postseason and win the heart of EVERY SINGLE philadelphia fan when he made that blasee catch on the mound in the first game against the Yanks.
2.) Trade Cliff lee to Seattle, loose Kyle Drabeck (the phils future) in a trade to Toronto to acquire Roy Halladay (The present)
3.) Watch Cliff Lee get traded to the Rangers, trade away J.A. Happ (Our present future) for Roy Oswalt (A Glorified Jamie Moyer)
4.) Watch Joe Blanton and Kyle Kendrick consistently be inconsistent and not quite be sure who Roy Oswalt really is.
We could have gone into the postseason with a rotation that looked like: Halladay, Lee, Hamels, Happ, Blanton/Kendrick. but thats pretty pie in the sky. i could have lived with Halladay, Hamels, Happ, Blanton, Kendrick. but i hate the idea of Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, Blanton, Kendrick. Two almost guarenteed losses, two who knows what, and one almost guarenteed win. i don't like those odds, especially since we have to rely on a bullpen that is as inconsistent as the second half of the rotation.
Now some people would bore you with everything that everyone is already saying. who should have been kept, who should have been moved where, when Blanton and Kendrick would play russian roulette... but here's an idea for this post season and even next year.
Lets say and pray Jamie Moyer comes back, and comes back to form for the playoffs, bam, one guarenteed loss changed to a maybe. sign pedro, see sentace above. next year sign Jamie and Pedro to half year contracts. Jamie is lights out up until the all star beak then he tends to fall off and kill his stats. Pedro gets attled before the july classic then as the pressure mounts starts to mow down batters like a freak (until he hits 100 pitches). why not just let both of them pitch in their ideal half of the season and have some fun with the post season rotation. i know a bunch of people will consider me moderatly retarded for saying these things but... lets be honest, it'd work.
1.) Trade for Cliff Lee. watch him tear up the postseason and win the heart of EVERY SINGLE philadelphia fan when he made that blasee catch on the mound in the first game against the Yanks.
2.) Trade Cliff lee to Seattle, loose Kyle Drabeck (the phils future) in a trade to Toronto to acquire Roy Halladay (The present)
3.) Watch Cliff Lee get traded to the Rangers, trade away J.A. Happ (Our present future) for Roy Oswalt (A Glorified Jamie Moyer)
4.) Watch Joe Blanton and Kyle Kendrick consistently be inconsistent and not quite be sure who Roy Oswalt really is.
We could have gone into the postseason with a rotation that looked like: Halladay, Lee, Hamels, Happ, Blanton/Kendrick. but thats pretty pie in the sky. i could have lived with Halladay, Hamels, Happ, Blanton, Kendrick. but i hate the idea of Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, Blanton, Kendrick. Two almost guarenteed losses, two who knows what, and one almost guarenteed win. i don't like those odds, especially since we have to rely on a bullpen that is as inconsistent as the second half of the rotation.
Now some people would bore you with everything that everyone is already saying. who should have been kept, who should have been moved where, when Blanton and Kendrick would play russian roulette... but here's an idea for this post season and even next year.
Lets say and pray Jamie Moyer comes back, and comes back to form for the playoffs, bam, one guarenteed loss changed to a maybe. sign pedro, see sentace above. next year sign Jamie and Pedro to half year contracts. Jamie is lights out up until the all star beak then he tends to fall off and kill his stats. Pedro gets attled before the july classic then as the pressure mounts starts to mow down batters like a freak (until he hits 100 pitches). why not just let both of them pitch in their ideal half of the season and have some fun with the post season rotation. i know a bunch of people will consider me moderatly retarded for saying these things but... lets be honest, it'd work.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Please tell me the Dead-Ball Era isn't a fluke here
I wrote this headline while getting drunk at 11am off of strong Rum and Cokes at my favorite Harrisburg restaraunt, Zia's. Matt Garza threw a one-walk no hitter. Matt Garza threw to 27 batters and 27 batters only (said one walk was erased on a double play). Matt Garza threw the 6th no hitter* of the year and was one walk shy of the 4th perfect game of the season*
*Please note, these numbers and this article will be recognizing Armando Gallaraga's perfect game that was robbed from him. the record books may never actually add it, but i promise you i ALWAYS will*
How is it that hitters have been so flappable this year? i haven't seen grown men stammer and stutter so bad since Leo McGarry's debate prep. At first this year they blamed the weather saying once the temperatures rose, so would the batting numbers. But then came May. The pitchers are still dominating the game. You can think of # pitchers off the top of your head that you know could be a cy young candidate (Cliff Lee, CC, Halladay, Jimenez, Johnson, Insert Cardnial Here, Linceculm) but can you tell me who will the real consistent hitters are this year?
jose Bautista (30 HR) Joey Votto (25 HR, 70 R, 68 RBI's, .318 BA), and Miguel Cabrerra ( 24 HR, 88 RBI). would you have guessed ay of them? no, you probably thought Pujols, A-roid, and Prince Fielder. i don't blame you but hey, lets be honest, its not the year of the hitter. BAs are down, RBIs and HRs at teh all star break are lower than they have been since pre steroid era...
... which brings me to the next point: you can't blame it all on the Steroirds. power numbers being down? ok, i'll but steroids playing a part, but you can't tell me that battign average was really helped that much by steroids. sure, it may be a factor because less balls are caught on teh warning track, but that doesn't account for enough, liners are down, situational hits are down, strike out counts are up. this has nothing to do with steroids.
Allow me to throw out my theory. it begins with the idea that the newest crop of young pitchers are a great corps of great arms. i can understand that, strasburg, johnson, jimenez... they're awesome, they're young. but why? my theory is that there is a bell curve in emphasis on each game./ i noticed it when the NFL was switching between power and speed backs. at first you wanted a powerback, a bulldozer to break down the opposing front seven. So what happened next? better defensive players came around, bigger stronger, meaner, they gobbled up the backs and the powerback was put on the shelf. enter the shifty speedy back, he came in and outran outmoved and out hustled the ogre defenders, so defenders had to become leaner, smarter, and more well rounded. this has had several curves over the history of the NFL
The same has happened in baseball. for years the league was dominated by hard hitting enigmatic hitters. now we have slick throwing smart pitchers.
I hope this sin't a fluke, i hope the dead ball year stretches into a dead ball era. i like defensive baseball... don't judge me
*Please note, these numbers and this article will be recognizing Armando Gallaraga's perfect game that was robbed from him. the record books may never actually add it, but i promise you i ALWAYS will*
How is it that hitters have been so flappable this year? i haven't seen grown men stammer and stutter so bad since Leo McGarry's debate prep. At first this year they blamed the weather saying once the temperatures rose, so would the batting numbers. But then came May. The pitchers are still dominating the game. You can think of # pitchers off the top of your head that you know could be a cy young candidate (Cliff Lee, CC, Halladay, Jimenez, Johnson, Insert Cardnial Here, Linceculm) but can you tell me who will the real consistent hitters are this year?
jose Bautista (30 HR) Joey Votto (25 HR, 70 R, 68 RBI's, .318 BA), and Miguel Cabrerra ( 24 HR, 88 RBI). would you have guessed ay of them? no, you probably thought Pujols, A-roid, and Prince Fielder. i don't blame you but hey, lets be honest, its not the year of the hitter. BAs are down, RBIs and HRs at teh all star break are lower than they have been since pre steroid era...
... which brings me to the next point: you can't blame it all on the Steroirds. power numbers being down? ok, i'll but steroids playing a part, but you can't tell me that battign average was really helped that much by steroids. sure, it may be a factor because less balls are caught on teh warning track, but that doesn't account for enough, liners are down, situational hits are down, strike out counts are up. this has nothing to do with steroids.
Allow me to throw out my theory. it begins with the idea that the newest crop of young pitchers are a great corps of great arms. i can understand that, strasburg, johnson, jimenez... they're awesome, they're young. but why? my theory is that there is a bell curve in emphasis on each game./ i noticed it when the NFL was switching between power and speed backs. at first you wanted a powerback, a bulldozer to break down the opposing front seven. So what happened next? better defensive players came around, bigger stronger, meaner, they gobbled up the backs and the powerback was put on the shelf. enter the shifty speedy back, he came in and outran outmoved and out hustled the ogre defenders, so defenders had to become leaner, smarter, and more well rounded. this has had several curves over the history of the NFL
The same has happened in baseball. for years the league was dominated by hard hitting enigmatic hitters. now we have slick throwing smart pitchers.
I hope this sin't a fluke, i hope the dead ball year stretches into a dead ball era. i like defensive baseball... don't judge me
Rookie Rites of passage
Its what they are you know. its not hazing... these days hazing is an act of terror or when a group of persons in a selective group put physical, mental, or emotional strain on a person who wants to be a member. What Roy Williams asked of Dez Bryant isn't hazing, its just a rookie rite of passage. But lets be honest, this really isnt that big of an issue. in fact, i trult believe it wouldn't even be a real issue if not for the numerous news outlets and uneducated bloggers (ah thank you). but in the world of Tweeting, sexting, espn boston and chat-roullette... nothing is above, or more legitamately, below news coverage and speculation.
But lets think with a (silly) thing called reason. what if Dez Bryant interpretted it as hazing. what if Dez just wanted to show Roy Williams that he doesn't see himself as any less of a reciever (because lets be honest if Miles Austin, Tony Romo or Jason Witten asked him... he probably would have done it. but i truly believe it IS a humiliation for a reciever as good as Dez Bryant (and im callin it, he is an immediate impact player) to have to carry the pads of an overated overpaid, underperforming never was thats always been outshined by the NEXT reciever to come in (see Calvin Johnson, Miles Austin). if Anything Roy Williams should have to carry someone's pads until he actually proves he is worth a damn.
But there are two sides to every reaction. Regardless of who asked Dez to do it, its an important tradition. maybe the rookies don't appreciate it and maybe it doesn't really mean that much to the veterans, but clearly not doing it is a big enough issue to cause a rift in team chemistry. Roy Williams has stated thats its really no big deal, but he said he'd get his due. run up the bill at dinner... but if Dez isn't going to carry the pads, why would he pick up the check? won't he get a little pissed aboutgetting taken advantage of anyways? Dez admits that if he knew how big of a deal it was he would have just done it. but thats apologizing without meaning it in my book. The only reason he regrets his decision is because it got him in hot water. Dez... i don't blame you.
Who's right? Who's wrong? Both... maybe neither... but lets be honest, this isn't really a story until it disrupts the team unity
But lets think with a (silly) thing called reason. what if Dez Bryant interpretted it as hazing. what if Dez just wanted to show Roy Williams that he doesn't see himself as any less of a reciever (because lets be honest if Miles Austin, Tony Romo or Jason Witten asked him... he probably would have done it. but i truly believe it IS a humiliation for a reciever as good as Dez Bryant (and im callin it, he is an immediate impact player) to have to carry the pads of an overated overpaid, underperforming never was thats always been outshined by the NEXT reciever to come in (see Calvin Johnson, Miles Austin). if Anything Roy Williams should have to carry someone's pads until he actually proves he is worth a damn.
But there are two sides to every reaction. Regardless of who asked Dez to do it, its an important tradition. maybe the rookies don't appreciate it and maybe it doesn't really mean that much to the veterans, but clearly not doing it is a big enough issue to cause a rift in team chemistry. Roy Williams has stated thats its really no big deal, but he said he'd get his due. run up the bill at dinner... but if Dez isn't going to carry the pads, why would he pick up the check? won't he get a little pissed aboutgetting taken advantage of anyways? Dez admits that if he knew how big of a deal it was he would have just done it. but thats apologizing without meaning it in my book. The only reason he regrets his decision is because it got him in hot water. Dez... i don't blame you.
Who's right? Who's wrong? Both... maybe neither... but lets be honest, this isn't really a story until it disrupts the team unity
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Athletes with Agents
it never used to be common noise, athletes with agents, but it seems like every second there is a new scandal about a student athlete being in cohoots with an agent. Reggie Bush started the fire but ever since the sanctions against USC came down its been breaking news after breaking news. is it becuase its now a bullseye and everyone is on edge? or is just that kids are a lot stupider these days? (yes, i used the word stupider for dramatic effect). Everyone's quick to give the coaches a lot of guff, and yes... it might be wise for them to include a day of "don't be an asshole and ruin our team" lectures, but its not their fault. its not even their job. self respect, responsibility and ownership are the things a college aged student learns from their parents.
Is it the Agents fault? about as much as it is the car salesman's fault you bought a lemon. he made it sound exotic, but you were stupid for buying it. Is it the fault of the student athlete. With regards to Reggie Bush, that just sucks for everyone. who do you penalize? Can't penalize the coach, he flew the coop to Seattle. can't chastize the player, he's too busy celebrating a world championship, and you can't penalize the Agents because this isn't a court of law. so what happens, the current students, fans, and athletes get screwed out of a chance for greatness.
So what do we do?
Lets assume this is going to happen no matter what. Its happened in the past (Chris Carter) its happening now (everyone in the SEC), it will happen in the future. so how do we make the playing field level, how do we keep it conducive to team chemistry, how do we make it legitamate.
Enter Hampsterdam. in season 4 of HBO's "The Wire" Major "Bunny" Colvin had a radical idea to, not legalize drugs, but decriminalize drugs. he pushed all of the drug trafficking to sections of Baltimore that were uninhabited and away from the parts of society trying to succeed. it was monitored: no weapons were allowed, there was on site medical testing and informational kiosks and active good doers there to make sure there was a quality of life in this new area. what happened? the rest of the city streets and corners were able to stay alive and thrive and enjoy peaceful existence. was it pretty everywhere? no but... it worked.
I say let them sign. if an agency is willing to put their money into a kid, they absolutly should be able to... but that kid gets no scholarship. no funding, no meal plan, NO help from the school. if its allowed, they will and only the cream of the crop will eve have the chance to have agents becuase if they're going to foot the bill for college, they aren't going to waste it on a bust. then more walk-on kids can get scholarships, more families can be helped out and maybe we can get back to playing college football as opposed to college politics.
Is it a pretty solution, absolutly not but... it'll work, and even if it doesnt... at least SOMETHING is being done
Is it the Agents fault? about as much as it is the car salesman's fault you bought a lemon. he made it sound exotic, but you were stupid for buying it. Is it the fault of the student athlete. With regards to Reggie Bush, that just sucks for everyone. who do you penalize? Can't penalize the coach, he flew the coop to Seattle. can't chastize the player, he's too busy celebrating a world championship, and you can't penalize the Agents because this isn't a court of law. so what happens, the current students, fans, and athletes get screwed out of a chance for greatness.
So what do we do?
Lets assume this is going to happen no matter what. Its happened in the past (Chris Carter) its happening now (everyone in the SEC), it will happen in the future. so how do we make the playing field level, how do we keep it conducive to team chemistry, how do we make it legitamate.
Enter Hampsterdam. in season 4 of HBO's "The Wire" Major "Bunny" Colvin had a radical idea to, not legalize drugs, but decriminalize drugs. he pushed all of the drug trafficking to sections of Baltimore that were uninhabited and away from the parts of society trying to succeed. it was monitored: no weapons were allowed, there was on site medical testing and informational kiosks and active good doers there to make sure there was a quality of life in this new area. what happened? the rest of the city streets and corners were able to stay alive and thrive and enjoy peaceful existence. was it pretty everywhere? no but... it worked.
I say let them sign. if an agency is willing to put their money into a kid, they absolutly should be able to... but that kid gets no scholarship. no funding, no meal plan, NO help from the school. if its allowed, they will and only the cream of the crop will eve have the chance to have agents becuase if they're going to foot the bill for college, they aren't going to waste it on a bust. then more walk-on kids can get scholarships, more families can be helped out and maybe we can get back to playing college football as opposed to college politics.
Is it a pretty solution, absolutly not but... it'll work, and even if it doesnt... at least SOMETHING is being done
is it really a Vick-tory?
Mike Vick just can't stay out of the news. but its not like its because he is a TMZ low-impact news guy... he makes big splashes in the headlines. If its not dogfighting its bakruptcy, if its not a shooting at his birthday, its bankruptcy fraud. Mike Vick can't help but make a splash... except of course for on the football field.
The man barely made an impact, was used very infrequently, had some dazzle but had some flops too. he has is and always will be an average quarterback at best. As a wildcat option, he's a dream come true. he's a refined tim tebow, an effective option, and a threat to be reconned with. Its a rebuilding year at Quarterback for the eagles so why not take some strain off of Kevin Kolb and use vick about 35% of the time. give vick 30 easy pass routes about 10 options and 4 keeper plays, throw him in (especially on 2nd and 18 or first and ten). Have a quarterback by committe and do work. but hey, Andy Reid knows what he's doing... unless it comes to coaching or child-raising.
For all the trouble he is to have as a member of the team the Eagles might as well get something for him. the man is damn near unpunishable now. Someone lies about Ben Rapelessberger taking advantage of her and he STILL gets suspended. Someone who helped ruin Vick's first life (and wasn't even invited) gets gunned down just 3-minutes after number 7 is invloved in seperate altercations and leaves his own birthday party, how does that NOT warrant a suspenssion.
Roger Goodell has been the enforcer, he has been the sherrif, he has been the law. if you even sneeze into trouble your reprimanded. if someone even suggests that you farted in church you get suspended. i want to know why Vick is above the law. but really, i want to know what the big deal over Mike Vick is. i have never cared about a backup as much as i do with vick. the man is barely ever seen in a football game yet gets more media attention than Derek Anderson, Chad Henne and Trent Edwards combined. from now on, i just dont care about Mike Vick until he's relevant
The man barely made an impact, was used very infrequently, had some dazzle but had some flops too. he has is and always will be an average quarterback at best. As a wildcat option, he's a dream come true. he's a refined tim tebow, an effective option, and a threat to be reconned with. Its a rebuilding year at Quarterback for the eagles so why not take some strain off of Kevin Kolb and use vick about 35% of the time. give vick 30 easy pass routes about 10 options and 4 keeper plays, throw him in (especially on 2nd and 18 or first and ten). Have a quarterback by committe and do work. but hey, Andy Reid knows what he's doing... unless it comes to coaching or child-raising.
For all the trouble he is to have as a member of the team the Eagles might as well get something for him. the man is damn near unpunishable now. Someone lies about Ben Rapelessberger taking advantage of her and he STILL gets suspended. Someone who helped ruin Vick's first life (and wasn't even invited) gets gunned down just 3-minutes after number 7 is invloved in seperate altercations and leaves his own birthday party, how does that NOT warrant a suspenssion.
Roger Goodell has been the enforcer, he has been the sherrif, he has been the law. if you even sneeze into trouble your reprimanded. if someone even suggests that you farted in church you get suspended. i want to know why Vick is above the law. but really, i want to know what the big deal over Mike Vick is. i have never cared about a backup as much as i do with vick. the man is barely ever seen in a football game yet gets more media attention than Derek Anderson, Chad Henne and Trent Edwards combined. from now on, i just dont care about Mike Vick until he's relevant
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
